Page 6 - C.A.L.L. #26 - Winter 2005/2006
P. 6

An  article  from  Communities magazine  (Fall  2005, Issue  #128) on
    the Emma Goldman Finishing School, an intentional community in
    Seattle, USA.

    Holding Our Resources in Common by Parke Burgess


    Nine years ago seven people with a dream found an old and condemned (but huge
    and spectacular) house for sale at a bargain price in the heart of one of Seattle's
    most  diverse  neighborhoods.  They  pooled  their  money  and  bought  the  place
    outright. Everyone contributed what they had: some threw in a few hundred bucks,
    others tens of thousands.

    They put the house in the name of one of their number, but made a courageous commitment: regardless
    of  how  much  or  little each  person put  in,  they  would  be  paid  back  during  the  same  time  period  (20+
    years); ownership of the house would be transferred to a land trust; and the tax benefit of this contribution
    would be given to the community. Thus was born the Emma Goldman Finishing School.

    In the early days, before the house was habitable, members would spend their evenings and weekends
    ripping the guts out of the walls, replacing the electrical system, adding plumbing, and putting in new
    sheetrock  and  fixtures  while  living  elsewhere  and  maintaining  income-earning  jobs  during  the  day.
    Gradually, everyone moved in. The renovation work was intense and virtually nonstop. This labor was
    surely a labor of love, but it was also strictly accounted for. Labor belonged to the community and was
    shared equally. Over the first five years or so, Emmas (then called Beacon Hill House) was a strict income-
    sharing community—all labor belonged to everybody. Money earned at jobs in the city was given in full
    to the community, and each got an equal (and modest) stipend.

    About four years ago Emmas began an experiment in a modified income sharing arrangement which we
    call labor-sharing.  As before, we each have a monthly labor quota (which is usually around 100 hours)
    which  we  divide  between  income-generating  work  in  the  city  and  in-house  labor.  Since  we  have  no
    community  business,  in-house  labor  tends  to  consist  of  meetings,  renovation,  cooking,  cleaning,
    bookkeeping, and so on. Everyone chooses what share of their labor quota they want to earn in income-
    generating or in-house labor. And it's all kept in balance by "the gizmo," a computer program that makes
    sure we get enough dollars and in-house labor each month to meet our carefully planned budget. We all
    owe  the  same  number  of  hours  each  month,  and  we  value  each  of  those  hours  equally,  regardless  of
    whether it's earned at a job or in-house, and whether the job pays high wages or low. We all owe the
    same number of hours each month, and we value each of those hours equally.

    In recent months, we have been experimenting with our labor-sharing system to make it more egalitarian,
    and more fluid. Under labor-sharing, we can work more than 100 hours in a month if we want and bank
    the surplus for personal use. That means extra hours or extra money from our jobs which we can use to
    cover  vacations  later.  This  year  we have  been  trying  out  a  policy  of  "spending  caps,"  which  limits  the
    amount  of  additional  personal  money  we're  allowed  to  spend  or  save.  Any  dollars  we  earn  above  the
    spending cap we loan to a fund to help start new egalitarian communities. We're also discussing a new
    policy that would allow us to trade our quota hours informally within the community.

    Our project at Emmas is explicitly anti-capitalist. We aim to create an economic system that can interact
    with  the  dominant  system  (because  that  can't  be  avoided),  but  which  neutralizes  capitalistic  values  as
    much  as  possible  for  community  members.  We  intend  to  build  a  much  larger  infrastructure  of
    communities  and  alternative  economic  systems  so  that  more  people  can  participate  in  anticapitalist
    lifeways. By creating viable alternatives to a system bent upon the consolidation of wealth and power, the
    use of violence, and the destruction of the environment, we hope to show by example that another way of
    life is possible; and we hope to develop the skills to live joyfully and work meaningfully in a different kind
    of world.

    Parke  Burgess  lives  at  the  Emma  Goldman  Finishing  School  in  Seattle  (www.egfi.org,)  and  is  Secretary  of  the  FEC
    (www.thefec.org). Reprinted with permission from Communities magazine, a quarterly publication about intentional communities and
    cooperative living in North America. Sample US$6; subscription US$20.00. store.ic.org.

                                                            6 6 6 6
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11